Burke
09-15-2005, 09:08 PM
All,
I just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts, recommendations or general words of wisdom (caution?) about a pay option ARM vs. a regular ARM vs. a fixed rate loan. My current investment strategy is to focus on SFH rental property (buy & hold) but I haven't purchased one yet. I am pre-approved and am in the search mode for a candidate property. The mortgage broker that I am working with is quick to share the benefits of a pay option ARM (what he calls a cash flow loan). Since I am looking at a buy and hold strategy, I am a little hesitant to use a loan that adds the unpaid interest to the balance of the principle but the broker is comparing the amount of unpaid interest that gets added against the anticipated increase in "cash flow" and believes the pay option ARM is still the way to go. He says that the increased cash flow resulting from the much lower payments of the pay option arm will far outweigh the unpaid interest. What I can't readily see in his calculations is whether or not the compouding of that added interest has been taken into account.
Would love to hear your thoughts on this and if anyone has some sort of tool that will allow a comparison of these products, that would be great as well.
Thanks in advance for your responses!
Burke
I just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts, recommendations or general words of wisdom (caution?) about a pay option ARM vs. a regular ARM vs. a fixed rate loan. My current investment strategy is to focus on SFH rental property (buy & hold) but I haven't purchased one yet. I am pre-approved and am in the search mode for a candidate property. The mortgage broker that I am working with is quick to share the benefits of a pay option ARM (what he calls a cash flow loan). Since I am looking at a buy and hold strategy, I am a little hesitant to use a loan that adds the unpaid interest to the balance of the principle but the broker is comparing the amount of unpaid interest that gets added against the anticipated increase in "cash flow" and believes the pay option ARM is still the way to go. He says that the increased cash flow resulting from the much lower payments of the pay option arm will far outweigh the unpaid interest. What I can't readily see in his calculations is whether or not the compouding of that added interest has been taken into account.
Would love to hear your thoughts on this and if anyone has some sort of tool that will allow a comparison of these products, that would be great as well.
Thanks in advance for your responses!
Burke